|
|
Dissertation Writing - Preparing The Way
- Beginning.
- Style of Advising
- Quantitative instruments
- Interpreting the results.
- The professional literature.
3. Quantitative Instruments
Professors who locate themselves exclusively in the quantitative camp demand
that students' research involve the compilation of data in the form of amounts.
Hence, they reject historical chronicles, philosophical analyses, a line of
logic leading to a conclusion, a comparison of the qualities of different societies,
the detailed description of an individual's or group's style of life, and the
like. Furthermore, adherents of quantitative studies sometimes prefer studies
that focus on rather large numbers of people, schools, cities, or political
constituencies so that broadly inclusive generalizations can be drawn from the
research results. Such adherents thus disapprove of studies focusing on one
autistic person (singlesubject research) or only a few subjects (three autistic
children, two schools, four candidates for political office, five neighborhoods)
whose results cannot, with confidence, be generalized to a wide range of people
or events. Proponents of quantitative studies tend to prefer such research methods
as controlled experiments and surveys that employ interviews, tests, systematic
observations, questionnaires, and quantitative content analysis.
In contrast, professors who subscribe strictly to qualitative methodology
tend to belittle research that involves what they may refer to as "no more
than number crunching" which they feel oversimplifies complex causes, dehumanizes
evidence, and fails to recognize individual differences among people, among
environments, and among events. Advocates of qualitative studies tend to favor
such research techniques as historical and philosophical analyses, descriptive
observation, case studies, ethnography, and hermeneutics.
In our opinion as authors of this volume, basic and applied topics are equally
desirable foci for theses and dissertations. However, not all professors would
agree. Some believe that basic research designed to promote understanding is
the proper aim of graduate students' studies. However, others insist that projects
should always focus on solving problems that confront societies and individuals.
Still other faculty members consider both basic and applied issues as worthy
matters for master's-degree and doctoral candidates to pursue.
Consequently, you may wish to discover the attitudes that potential advisors
have about basic and applied studies so that you can try to find members for
your research committee whose preferences are in keeping with your own.
For some students, a key criterion for selecting an advisor is a professor's
gender, ethnic origin, or religious affiliation. Such a stipulation can lead
to trouble
Not only can fellow students offer useful observations about faculty advisors,
but they may also help you in other ways at each stage of your research and
writing.
At the beginning, when you are choosing a research problem to pursue, your peers
may suggest potential topics and may identify advantages and weaknesses of topics
you have under consideration.
As you survey the professional literature that relates to your project, your
compatriots may help by suggesting sites to search on the Internet, by sharing
relevant articles and books, and by showing you the system they use for taking
notes and organizing their references.
During the data-collecting stage, fellow students can be asked to critique
the methods (survey, ethnography, experiment, historical analysis) and instruments
(tests, questionnaires, interviews, observations) that you intend to employ.
They may help you gather data by distributing questionnaires, conducting interviews,
or administering tests. They may also help you classify the information you
collect by suggesting categories in which to place data or by assessing the
strengths and shortcomings of the classification scheme you plan to adopt. Your
peers may also be able to suggest appropriate methods of statistical or hermeneutic
analysis and perhaps participate in carrying out the analysis.
|
|